Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
Socialize
 

Recent Topics
Topic Replies Last Post
Wedding gift... can someone help me to translate it? 6 2018/6/30 20:50
Barga18
Aomori-Ken 0 2018/6/19 10:27
hanzo-tou
Certificates 0 2018/5/8 4:34
schistkicker
Home Project: Shadowbox 3 2018/4/25 21:44
roufus
Ichiba 0 2018/2/21 1:18
Dpinga
   All Posts (Garth)


(1) 2 3 4 ... 7 »


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
So after two pages since my original post where I have been called an idiot, or someone who fails to know what I am talking about, even though I might add, I have made no claims, but only asked questions or suggestions.

I have produced quotes by Dr Karl Friday and even produced statistics of battlefield injuries. I have spoken about the Gyokko Ryu Densho which no one has claimed I am wrong about i.e. Togakure Ryu being listed on the Gyokko Ryu Densho, I have even pointed out where Don can find the informaton in relation to the sword lengths when he posted in relation to what i wrote...

Quote:
Garth wrote:
Well as it was explained to me, The swords on the battlefields were too heavy and cumbersome to do those type of cuts. These cuts are common with latter edo period sword work (Off the battlefield) but not on the battlefield.


His reply...

Quote:
Accept the fact that you know nothing about the subject matter and stop postulating about things only to try to defend your theories later on as the silliness of them is pointed out to you.


So he fails to say why I am wrong.

OK I pointed out earlier that Don should read some books by an author called Dr Hatsumi. Do try page 96 of Japanese sword fighting where he talks about the importance of spear over sword and how easier the spear was to use over the sword and how many famous swordsmen during war actually were spearmen first. And on page 94 he talks about the spears effectiveness to penetrate the weak points in the armour (No Don not slashes with swords against armour) The blade even if a sword was used was to be aimed towards weakness between the armour plates.

Here Don let me quote it for you page 92

"In a situation in which one has to fight a soldier who is protected by armour, inflicting damage with a single stroke of the sword is a very difficult technique that requires exceptional ability.....thrusting and cutting in to a weakness in the armour..."

As I said Don read it. He's quite good you know.

He also speaks in that same book about how the length in shaku and sun changed over time in regard to the warring states period and the Tokugawa period, and how long the swords really were in the Warring states period. And according to Dr Hatsumi 1573 - 92 roughly 2 shaku 2 sun. yet 1331-33 4 shaku 4 sun (twice as long Don), and he continues about the length of the swords in different periods.

Are you seriously trying to say that a sword like the one on page 176 can be handled as easily as a Tokugawa period katana?


But anyway back to my main point.

Even though i have made quotes, references, statistics all the posters have done on here is try to make out that I know nothing about what i am suggesting. But the interesting point is that the posters on here have failed to actually bring up any counter evidence to what I have suggested.

All they say is "Why should we tell you" or why should I waste my time (even though they continue to reply to my posts)

And to reply to Mr Mrdunsky (I apologise if thats wrong) Yes my group is now in the process of joining the Bujinkan and as far as i am aware I have never been banned from Kutaki.

And yes we are joining via Norman Smithers and we will be training with him on a monthly basis.

But you know although I have respect for many people in the Bujinkan when I get involved in debates like this I can understand why the Bujinkan has a very bad rap.

I'm done here.

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/18 17:41
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
But following from my last post

Benkyoka posted

Quote:
Because it has sword work in it.


This is a claim. To which i have asked a source for.

Quote:
Yes, somehow I knew you were going to find a way to mention that you had a degree, but still manage to foul up any statistics you might find.


This is also a claim. Please state why either the statistics are wrong, or how I have misunderstood the statistics.

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/18 3:00
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
Cuchulain posted

Quote:
Garth, I'm far from an expert in such matters, but I do know that there is a lot more material contained within the nine ryuha than is publicly known about. It's seems foolish to argue in public about things you probably don't have as good a picture of as you may think.


I think your post is a good one and certainly warns against people making claims, but I think we need to look at where I have done this. I started my posts on this thread by posting.

Quote:
Just a thought, but is there any reason that Gyokko Ryu should have sword work within it.


Note this is not a claim its a thought, an idea I am throwing into the pot as a means of discussion.

I continue...

Quote:
From what i understand Gyokko Ryu was a method of martial arts passed down by monks and as such carrying a sword might be against the teachings they were following.


Note the phrase from what I understand. Again NOT a claim.

Quote:
In regard to sword work, I think that the sword is over estimated as a weapon on the battlefields of Japan. What swords were used were probably very large.


Note the phrase "I think" again not a claim.

Quote:
Have you ever wondered why we have lots of defences from downward cuts and thrusts but not defences from same gyaku kesa giri or kesa giri or yoko giri.

Well as it was explained to me, The swords on the battlefields were too heavy and cumbersome to do those type of cuts. These cuts are common with latter edo period sword work (Off the battlefield) but not on the battlefield.


Note the phrases "Have you ever wondered" and As it was explained to me"

In otherwords someone elses opinion which i am open to discusion about.

Quote:
Also statistics of battlefield injuries in the sengoku Jidai in regard to the sword injuries from the weapon were very very few. The spear, bow and gun making up the most casualties that seem to appear.


Here I produce my first quote evidence from Dr Karl Friday.

Not my views, the views of an eminent historian in Japanese history.

I finish by saying...

Quote:
So if Gyokko Ryu was a Buddhist influenced art which was the foundation of Ninjutsu and used by Ninja like Momochi Whoses job was spying), why would the art have any sword work, especilally if it was never used on the battlefield.

And any sword work a ninja like Momochi would need would be in the Togakure Ryu.

Incidently isnt the Togakure Ryu also in the Gyokko ryu makimono


Notice the phrases "So if", "Why would", "Incidently isnt"

Are these not all questions. In fact where in this post have I made a claim.

But the answer is to that post

Quote:
Accept the fact that you know nothing about the subject matter and stop postulating about things only to try to defend your theories later on as the silliness of them is pointed out to you.


Notice how Don has taken what I said as though its a claim. Yet nowhere in this first post have I actually claimed anything. In fact what i did post was in the form of a question.

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/18 2:51
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
This could be of interest

http://www.genbukan.org/cgi-bin/site. ... 5&csProduct_productID=223

Funny no mention of swords in Gyokko ryu

and he states

"The Grandmaster Hachiryu Nyudo used a secret weapon called a "Kyoketsu-Shoge" to hit the enemies sword and disarm them"

As for the idea about Buddhism you do know what the prefix "Doshi" means dont you. you know as in Gamon Doshi, Garyu Doshi

Which is probably why it says...

"Gyokko Ryu's motto is to try to have harmony, even with the enemy and to avoid fighting while keeping a smile. If there is no choice but to fight, then completely knock down the enemy without allowing them to touch you."

Anyway Don until you can come back with some sources i think its best we both dont waste time here

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/17 21:21
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
Don Roley posted

"Because, as I noted you would take a lot of time to write and you would ignore it and instead debate away in an attempt to post yourself as an expert in the field instead of being honest in trying to learn something.

So why should I bother?"

Well your obviously not bothered with te time it takes to keep replying to me, so why not post why you believe what i wrote was rubbish.

And I suspect again that after this you will reply again, yet still dont have the time to actually tell me why I am wrong.

"Yes, somehow I knew you were going to find a way to mention that you had a degree, but still manage to foul up any statistics you might find."

Where are the statistics wrong?

Or are you not going to tell me because you dont have time?

"I do not consider saying that I have had a bit more experience in the matter, and that you have no knowledge of the matter, to be arrogant. It is just simple fact."

Thats called arrogance Don

"Here is a question for you to ponder, if swords were against the monkish habits you mention preventing Gyokko ryu members from carrying swords- why did they carry Kyoketsushoge?"

Yes i know, heres a question for you to ponder Don, if Gyokko ryu had a kyokessu shoge, why did they need a sword?

"And why is there a battlefield version that replaces the cord with a chain?"

Again why did they need a sword if they had a bloody great chain weapon?

And possibly just possibly don as the kyoketsu shoge was a binding weapon it might fit in with a Buddhists idea of non violence.

Although of course we must understand the modern interpretation of that Non violence as opposed to the Tantric idea.

"Were you even aware of these simple facts? If you had read Hatsumi's articles in Hiden magazine for the last decade or so, you might. The fact that the kyoketsushoge is from Gyokko ryu is not even that hard to find in English sources."

Yes I was aware and if my stuff wasnt packed up for moving I could tell you who invented it.

"I see a very long post by you trying to say that you do indeed know something, but my advice to you is still to approach things from the standpoint that you know nothing. Because people inside and outside the Bujinkan are pointing out that you know nothing and you are letting your ego get in the way of your growth.

But you will not find many people willing to help you overcome your ignorance until you make an honest effort to prove that you are willing to listen and learn. We can't help you until we see that you will honestly listen and try to understand instead of pumping yourself up as an expert once again."

Whose an expert?

At least when i debate I post sources

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/17 20:44
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
Benkoka posted

"Because it has sword work in it."

Source please

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/17 19:38
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
Don

Thanks for you friendly advice yet although you basically have stated that I am talking crap, you have not at all explained how you believe I am talking crap.

What I have posted I can use sources for. The sources have not only been posted on other forums i.e. the statistics for battlefield injuries in the sengoku Jidai period but was also something I looked at as part of my degree in archaeology at Leicester university. the battlefield injuries articles are I believe in World archaeology proceedings. They are on file at Leicester university.

If you take time to read through the archaeological findings you will notice that any sword cuts that are delivered are either thrusts or cuts to the head. Not too many kesa giri cuts, or certainly none that i could find in the literature.

By the way heres the link to some statistics.

http://www.angelfire.com/gundam/manji/page39.html

Note Don, that there were only 58 sword wounds to 1428 wounds with other weapons. Even thrown rocks caused more damage.

But then I guess Dr Karl Fridays statistics are wrong too?

This from sword forum international

"It is often supposed that the Japanese sword arts of today are directly linked to the arts of the Sengoku Jidai, the age of wars that predated the Tokugawa peace. While it is true that some of the schools I will describe claim an unbroken lineal descent from that time to this, it is doubtful what we study today is what was practiced on those long ago battlefields"

And we know that there were major changes in sword styles after the beginning of the Tokugawa period.

The article also states

"Add to that the relative lack of detailed technical writing about the schools (often what was written was barely more than a listing of techniques) and you are left with the almost inescapable conclusion that what we practice today is barely linked to what the Samurai in the wars practiced."

And if your going to claim I'm wrong in this regard then you need to provide EVIDENCE.

As Dr Karl Friday pointed out in regard to historical evidence

"There aren't any e-maki densho that date back to the sengoku era--the earliest extant example comes from 1596, but this genre of document didn't really become popular until the mid-17th century. Other kinds of documents from the pre-Tokugawa era aren't much help either. The catalogs of techniques and principles that were produced during this era are just unannotated lists. There are instructional poetry collections from earlier periods, but this kind of verse tends to focus of general principles, not technical matters.

So what we're left with is the kata of the ryuha themselves, as it exists today and/or as it is depicted in Tokugawa era documents. I don't know of any of the latter that depict battlefield jujutsu. And the former is always problematic: Most ryuha, of course, claim to do exactly the same things today that they were doing in the 1600s. Unfortunately, this is clearly wishful thinking. Changes to the outward forms of techniques are inevitable in arts like the bugei, which are transmitted mostly by direct man-to-man instruction. 400 years of playing "the telephone game" can introduce a lot of static. And the bugei evolved quite a bit during the early Tokugawa era."

So pleae Don if your going to say that what I am saying is rubbish you need to provide evidence to the contrary. As Densho of swordsmanship from the mid Sengoku Jidai period would be a place to start.

As for the second part you posted, maybe you can tell us all when and where Gyokko ryu was used on the battlefield?

I'm sure I at least would find it interesting.

Theres some great books Don by an author I know you would love. His names is Dr Masaaki Hatsumi, you should look them out sometime and have a read.

Finally you posted

"It would take a very long, detailed post that you would probably ignore and try to debate to appear that you are not as ignorant as we know you are."

As opposed to arrogant as some people have said that you are.

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/17 19:37
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Kenjutsu in the Bujinkan
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
Just a thought, but is there any reason that Gyokko Ryu should have sword work within it.

From what i understand Gyokko Ryu was a method of martial arts passed down by monks and as such carrying a sword might be against the teachings they were following.

Hense Gyokko Ryu was a form of martial arts where an unarmed individual could protect himself from an armed assailant.

Remember that in Gyokko Ryu even the basic forms start from a bowing hand clasped (Gasho Rei) position thus suggesting its links to Buddhism.

Incidently the above could also apply to Koto Ryu too.

In regard to sword work, I think that the sword is over estimated as a weapon on the battlefields of Japan. What swords were used were probably very large.

Have you ever wondered why we have lots of defences from downward cuts and thrusts but not defences from same gyaku kesa giri or kesa giri or yoko giri.

Well as it was explained to me, The swords on the battlefields were too heavy and cumbersome to do those type of cuts. These cuts are common with latter edo period sword work (Off the battlefield) but not on the battlefield.

Also statistics of battlefield injuries in the sengoku Jidai in regard to the sword injuries from the weapon were very very few. The spear, bow and gun making up the most casualties that seem to appear.

So if Gyokko Ryu was a Buddhist influenced art which was the foundation of Ninjutsu and used by Ninja like Momochi Whoses job was spying), why would the art have any sword work, especilally if it was never used on the battlefield.

And any sword work a ninja like Momochi would need would be in the Togakure Ryu.

Incidently isnt the Togakure Ryu also in the Gyokko ryu makimono

Garth

Posted on: 2009/7/17 17:29
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Another Ninjutsu organization in South America?
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
Skuggvarg posted

Quote:
"I wont share what is not commonly known on any forum, sorry. I can hint you as to how to find out on your own, but in your case, since your no longer part of the Bujinkan, it will be extremely difficult for you to approach some of the better sources for information I think"


Oh I see its a secret never to be divulged to anyone outside the inner circle.

LOL Thought so, what a cop out

Posted on: 2009/4/17 19:38
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Another Ninjutsu organization in South America?
Villager
Joined:
2005/4/13 23:35
Group:
村民 :: Villager
Posts: 72
Offline
Shuggvarg posted

"If you just read, re-read and then use your brain a little you can make a pretty good picture by yourself of what has happened. I once thought like you and did my homework and started to dig into things. Still do to this date. "

Shuggvarg i find this very patronising. How do you know i havent done my home work, what makes you think that because you have done yours, that your right and i'm wrong.

Please if you any thing you can contrubute to the discussion then please do so, but to just start using sentnces like this i find slightly insulting.

Garth

Posted on: 2009/4/17 1:55
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer



 Top
(1) 2 3 4 ... 7 »




Today's Sponsor